AUBURN UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATIVE & PROFESSIONAL ASSEMBLY

April 30, 2001 – 10:00 A.M. (unapproved)

Dixon Conference Center – Ballroom A

 

 

 

Ellyn Hix, Chair, called the meeting to order.  Assembly members present were:  John Asmuth, Dennis Block, Stacey Bozeman, Amy Douglas, Ralph Foster, Kathy Harmon, Ellyn Hix, Harriette Huggins, Kathryn Jarvis, Greg Lund, Larry Moore, Ed People, Miriam Brown Pepinsky, Kevin Robinson, Linda Sayers, Janine Slick, Mary Lou Smith, Martha Taylor, Kim Trupp, and Teresa Vest.

 

 

Review and Approval of Prior Minutes.   The minutes from the March 5, 2001, Assembly meeting were reviewed.  Kim Trupp moved that the minutes be approved.  Janine Slick seconded the motion.  The minutes were approved. 

 

 

Speaker, Dr. Walker:  Ellyn Hix introduced Dr. William Walker, Interim President of Auburn University.  Dr. Walker provided an up-date on the issues confronting the University, stating that in the past eight weeks the issues were still the same, but with some significant developments.  Dr. Walker reported that tax revenues are lower than expected, which has resulted in proration of the current year’s budget and a budget reduction for the coming year.  Though the joint efforts of the four-year colleges, universities, and the legislators, a three percent budget reduction for next year has been negotiated; however, the governor has held up this legislation. The problem of proration has remained unresolved and now the governor is holding up this agreement on next year’s budget hostage over the proration issue. Through court cases and attempts at making the entire state aware of the effects proration on higher education, the universities are fighting back.

 

Dr. Walker, also, addressed the issue of shared governance.  Since many groups have expressed their lack of confidence in the Board of Trustees, Dr. Walker has worked to resolve the issue of shared governance through open communication, and is taking steps to address each segment of the issue.

 

Joe Ed People expressed his appreciation for the stand Dr. Walker has taken for higher education during these difficult times.

 

 

Speaker, Sherrie Fulford:  Ellyn Hix introduced Sherri Fulford from the Office of Governmental Affairs.  Ms. Fulford explained the function of the Office of Governmental Affairs, and discussed some of the current issues and legislation that they were working on.  The floor was then opened for questions.

 

Question:  Is there any possibility on Constitutional Reform being on anyone’s agenda in the near future?

 

Fulford:  There are a few bills on the floor now that address one or two articles,                                    but  Constitutional Reform will mean tax reform.  It will be difficult to get any action with redistricting going on and with an election year coming up.

 

Question:  Is there anything specific going on with the property tax to address the education situation?

 

Fulford:  Several bills are going on, but they keep being cut down at the local district level.

 

Question:  How long do you expect the court case [concerning proration] to be drawn out?

 

Fulford:  We expect something this week.

 

Question:  I have lived under several state governments.  All these people can see that there are unfair things going on.  Why cannot the legislators see that something unfair is going on here?

 

Fulford:  It has to do with the fact that a large percentage of the legislators have been teachers, principles and others associated with K-12.

 

Question:  I thought Governor Wallace set up the Junior Colleges.  Has their mission changed?  They appear to have become feeder schools.  How do we compare with other states as to the number of institutions we have, and can we not do something with Junior Colleges like not accepting their students?

 

Fulford:  We have the Articulation Act in this state, which requires that we work with the Junior Colleges to come up with a group of courses that would be automatically transferred.  They are trying to become the freshmen and sophomore years.

 

Question: I know that there are a number of questionable entities paid out of the ETF [Educational Trust Fund].  How loosely defined is the use of these funds.

 

Fulford:  Very loosely, except that it is suppose to be for educational purposes.  There is a current bill in the legislator that is addressing this.  It would change the law to those who get any money from the trust fund, it can only be spent for educational purposes, not operations, and you will have to document that.

 

Committee Reports:  For the Nominations and Elections Committee, Michael Miller reported that they have been working mainly on two issues.  The first was to find a way to have appropriate representation from each vice-president group.  This will require some changes in the AP Assembly’s constitution.  This committee has been looking at the parts of the constitution that effect representation and elections.  They will submit recommended changes to the Executive Committee, and eventually to the entire Assembly.   Secondly, they will be sending out interest surveys and making nominations for next year’s officers.

 

Melissa Long reported that the Professional Development has been seeking to get approval for the AP Consulting Policy that has been being utilized since 1995 as a draft policy.  This committee is also looking and evaluating courses for training employees.

 

Mary Anne Taylor-Simms reported that the Welfare Committee has been studying the value of a leave bank vs. our current salary continuation.  The committee found that most schools have a leave bank, but do not have salary continuation.  The committee decided that our current salary continuation program is superior over a leave bank program, and that it would not be advisable to pursue a leave bank at this time. 

 

The Welfare Committee did feel that we need a way to get information on current benefits out to Assembly members.  They have someone on the committee to do this through the A U Report.  Suggestions on other ways to get this information out would be welcomed.

 

The Grievance Committee presented no report.

 

 

Adjournment.  The motion to adjourn was made by Harriette Huggins and seconded by Greg Lund.

 

Respectively submitted

Kathy Harmon