AUBURN UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL
ASSEMBLY
Monday, December 2, 2002 – 2:00 p.m.
Dixon Conference Center
Approved February 21, 2003
Kathy Harmon, Chair, called the meeting to order at
2:04 p.m.
The following assembly members were present: John
Asmuth, Dennis Block,Stacy Bozeman, Cara Mia Braswell, Drew Burgering,
Amy Douglas, Lisa Fleming, Kathy Harmon, Phyllis Harris, Harriette Huggins,
George Konstant, Melissa Morris,Cathy
Ramey, Karen Rankin, Betty Reese, Anna Reynolds, Linda Sayers, Thomas Stofer,
Martha Taylor, Mary Ann Taylor-Sims, Kim Trupp.
Review and Approval of Prior Minutes: A motion
by Dennis Block, seconded by Linda Sayers to approve the minutes of the
August 13, 2002 meeting passed. The minutes were approved as printed.
Kathy Harmon presented the speaker, Sherri Fulford,
Office of Government Affairs, who presented an update on the budget and
finance prospects for FY03. With a new governor and new legislature we
do not see many changes forthcoming. The fact is Auburn University does
have a great deal of legislative support. The big difference will be in
the Senate where the Lt. Gov. is a Democrat. Lucy Baxley has pledged support
for higher education.
-
Budget Cycle.
-
Alabama ended FY02 by the “skin of our teeth.” The only way we were able
to end the year without proration was because they went through all accounts
related to Education and scrapped the dollars to come up with the money
to get us over into the next fiscal year. Because it was one time money
we were able to meet the budget – some of it was through residuals from
the bond issue, which we will be paying for many years to come.
-
We enter FY03 knowing we will be $130M in the hole. Revenue estimates indicate
money is not coming in the way it should; last year (02) we did not have
enough money. FY03 budget was based on revenue that should have come in
during FY02 and did not. Income tax collections were down 1 ½ percent
for FY02, General sales tax was flat or low, Corporate income tax revenue
was down, Gross sales tax was up only because of sales tax. Able to scrap
together about $200M. Able to pay all the Corporate Income Tax refunds
due for the last year and a half. Expect $130-$200M shortfall in FY03.
There is about $240M in the “Rainy day account” which will probably be
tapped to meet the FY03 budget. Once tapped, it is gone. Legislation provided
for repayment of the money, but did not specify how it was to be repaid.
With no process to follow there is not much incentive to put the money
back in.
-
FY04 is when things are really going to hit hard. Teacher Retirement has
used reserves and is seeking $78M. PEHIP, the Public Employees Health Insurance
Program (We participate as retirees) is increasing from $433 per employee
to $522, a little over $100M additional funds.
-
Campaign for Alabama, a group of 16 Birmingham business leaders, have been
meeting under leadership of Bill O'Conor. The are talking about what they
can do. They are looking at all levels of education to see what the impact
for ETF will be. They have raised $3M. This inclusive group may have some
influence developing plans for tax reform to hit everyone. They're meeting
will representatives of education. Auburn University has already priortized
and determined needs, as well as having set up proration prevention fund.
This has beendone internally. Hope all these things will put AU in a favorable
position when we go before the Campaign for Alabama to explain needs and
why we merit additional funds. Should meet in January. Adamant that tax
structure is morally wrong. Attempt to level burden of who pays how much.
Some changes require consitutional. The group is not addressing Constitutional
reform. Because so much tax legislation is tied to the constitution, the
hope is by addressing tax reform and making some changes, then Constitutional
reform might be more acceptable.
Questions:
-
Could the Proration Prevention Fund come back to bite us? No. It
only amounts to $6-8M and it is not enough to make a difference in appropriation,
but it is enough to make it clear that Auburn University is accountable.
Other institutions say they would establish a "rainy day account" if they
could get more money from the state. Auburn bit the bullet and made the
necessary changes to reduce costs. There was a lot of unhappiness when
we were going through the process of examining viability of programs, merging
programs, but in the end able to live with allocations when other institutions
have not. We have raised tuition when others said they could not attract
students. Auburn has proved that wrong. We are largest institution; we
have largest freshman class, we are continuing to grow.
-
Do you forsee us going into proration at the end of this year? Probably
earlier than that. After first of year when new governor looks at accounts
and revenue income, he will most likely call for proration.
-
What sort of support do you see coming from Gov-elect Riley? University
representatives will be meeting tomorrow. He indicates an understanding
of the role of research and economic development within the state. We are
optimistic.
-
Speak to the issue of the fighting between K-12 and higher ed over funding
and the fact that higher ed always seems to be on the short end. Friction
remains. Paul Hubbert runs a very effective political machine. The emotions
of the public are K-12, you are talking about their children. We are working
to get past and form coalition to work together with the Campaign for Alabama
with ways to work together to increase amount of money available for all
levels of education. Auburn has gone through all the streamlining and still
there is not enough money. It is hoped that experience will help folks
understand there is not enough money going into education.
-
I have read of a proposal by Roy Johnson to separate the education budget
into two separate budgets -- one for K-12 and one for higher ed.
Is that a possibility or a wild idea? Wild ideas sometimes have a way
of becoming law! What he really proposes is take K-16 (including the 2-year
institutions), making it a
function of state government and never being subject to proration. Auburn
University has no problem with K-12 getting as much funding as it needs.
We do not support unlimited funding for two-year schools over four-year
schools. Campaign for Alabama is looking at two-year schools as a work-force
development system. Because of that it may be shifted back into K-12, where
it used to be a division of the State Department of Education. Two -year
schools were broken out in 1982 during the first James administration,
making it the Department of Post-Secondary Education with a Chancellor
and administrative structure. It all depents
-
Any possibility of Alabama going to a Board of Regents system like Georgia?
All four year institutions are fighting for pieces of the higher education
dollars. It would seem at some point in time all four-year institutions
would have more level funding. There is no discussion of a Board of
Regents at this time. The Campaign for Alabama is not discussing this at
all. We have "formula funding." If
that formula were used, institutions would get their funding according
to factors in the funding, there would be level funding for institutions.
We just can't seem to get the formula to work. Auburn' s state funding
is about 60 percent of the regional average and others are at 90 percent
there is inequity. If there is an across the board 2 percent increase,
the inequity continues. If the 2 percent increase was applied according
to the formula, equity would eventually result.
I am leaving
information about the Auburn Legislative Action Network, friends
of Auburn,an initiative called Tiger
Tracks to encourage involvement in the legislative process by contacting
legislators about needs for resources. There is a calendar to let you know
what to do during a particular period of time. Talk to your legislator
after the organizational session. During the session, look out for legislation
affecting Auburn University and write to legislators.
We are
in a wait and see mode until we can see what the positions of new governor
and Campaign for Alabama has in mind to develop our legislative plan for
the regular session.
Ms. Harmon
presented the following nominees to serve on the A&P Nominations committee:
Dianne Jay, Office of Sponsored
Programs
Mary Ann McKenzie, Internal
Auditing
Dianne Anderson, Research
Institute
A motion by Kim Trupp, seconded by Drew Burgering,
to accept the nominations as presented passed.
Committee reports
The Nominations Committee is working on recommendations
for getting better representation. There are problems arising out
of shifting of Vice-Presidents every year resulting in unbalanced representation.
We continue to work in that area. We need to continue to encourage people
to participate and want to be involved. Ms. Harmon called attention to
the separation of Alumni & Development between two Vice-Presidents,
the area of Development has no representation on the Assembly.
Grievance committee has had more grievances
come before it this year than at any time previously.
-
Training with HRD and Staff representatives. The course will be offered
on a regular basis.
-
Guidelines do not address some of the things we were seeing. More detailed
procedures need to be developed in conjunction with Human Resources. Looking
at record keeping and time frames for
Ms. Harmon addressed a question about how committee
members are selected. Surveys are distributed to A& P employees in
the spring of each year. The nominations committee reviews the names of
people who express willingness to serve to develop a slate of nominees
to the committees. The Assembly votes. It was suggested that Nominations
committee include short bios about each nominee for Assembly positions
when ballots are distributed.
The grievance process was explained. Extension Service,
Faculty, A&P employess, and Staff employees groups all have grievance
procedures. Our procedure is described on A&P website and also appears
in the A&P Handbook, p.23 Administive and Professional Grievance
policy.
New Business: Tom Stofer requested the assembly
consider scheduling a program in the future for Pat Deery to explain the
Professional Enhancement Program.
Adjournment. There
being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 2:50 p.m.