Purpose

These guidelines give instructors and students a shared vocabulary for when/how AI may be used in any course context. This complements the Academic Integrity Policy (see Academic Integrity) as well as any department- or college-specific policies. The recommendations here are guidelines only and do not constitute official university policy.

Instructors are invited to select and integrate the items that make the most sense for them, given their course and curricular contexts.

Faculty should consider taking Teaching with AI at Auburn, offered through the Biggio Center, assigning A Guide to AI Enhanced Learning to your students, and seeking relevant programming from University Writing.

Students should consider taking A Guide to AI Enhanced Learning, created by Auburn Online and hosted by AU Libraries, and seek additional guidance from the Miller Writing Center and Academic Support.

Guiding Principles for Students

Students should consider taking A Guide to AI Enhanced Learning, created by Auburn Online and hosted by AU Libraries, and seek additional guidance from the Miller Writing Center and Academic Support.

Faculty may share these principles with students as a point of discussion about AI ethics and acceptable practices.

  • Responsibility: You are responsible for the work you submit and for meeting learning goals.

  • Transparency: You should be explicit about whether, how, and why AI was used (see AI Contributions).

  • Documentation: You should document prompts, decisions, and verification steps proportionate to the assignment (for example, brief notes for small tasks and fuller records for major projects); talk with your instructor for assignment- or course-specific guidance.

Guiding Principles for Faculty

Faculty should discuss their own practices and principles related to AI ethics as well. In general, faculty should consider:

  • Acknowledging your use of AI tools for creating course materials

  • Disclosing your use of AI tools

  • Avoiding submitting personally identifiable or FERPA-protected student information to AI tools that have not been vetted and approved by the university, including for purposes of automated assessment

  • Reducing or eliminating the use of AI detectors, which are unreliable and easily fooled

Usage Level Selection

Faculty may select from among four different permission levels for their assignments, courses, or curricula.

  • Option 1, Open Use: AI is encouraged across the workflow (brainstorm → draft → revise) while meeting learning goals; students must disclose use and verification.

  • Option 2, Moderate Use: AI use is allowed for most stages; students must include an AI disclosure note describing how they used it and how they verified results.

  • Option 3, Moderate Prohibition: AI may be used for tasks not directly related to the creation of a final product (e.g., debug hints, study tool).

  • Option 4, Strict Prohibition: AI use is not permitted.

The following language (courtesy of the Biggio Center) can be adapted to syllabi and assignment prompts to describe expectations for these usage levels.

Link to Option 1, Open Use Guidelines
AI Policy: Permitted in this Course with Attribution

In this course, students are encouraged to use Generative AI Tools like ChatGPT or Copilot to support their work. To maintain academic integrity, students must disclose any AI-generated material they use and properly attribute it, including in-text citations, quotations, and references. Students should exercise caution when using public AI tools that may not guarantee data protection, now or in the future (such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc.), and avoid sharing any sensitive or private information. Examples of such information include personally identifiable information (PII), protected health information (PHI), financial data, intellectual property (IP), and any other legally protected data. For those seeking a private AI tool with Enterprise Level Data Protection, Microsoft Copilot is available by logging in with their AU email and password. This ensures that chats will not be used to train external AI tools, and data will remain within the Auburn University ecosystem.

A student should include the following statement in assignments to indicate use of a Generative AI Tool: “The author(s) would like to acknowledge the use of [Generative AI Tool Name and version], a language model developed by [Generative AI Tool Provider], in the preparation of this assignment. The [Generative AI Tool Name] was used in the following way(s) in this assignment [e.g., brainstorming, grammatical correction, citation, which portion of the assignment].”

Link to Option 2, Moderate Use Guidelines
AI Policy: Permitted when Assigned in this Course with Attribution

In this course, students are permitted to use Generative AI Tools such as ChatGPT or Copilot for specific assignments or activities, as designated by the instructor. To maintain academic integrity, students must disclose any use of AI-generated material. As always, students must properly use attributions, including in-text citations, quotations, and references. Students should exercise caution when using public AI tools that may not guarantee data protection, now or in the future (such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc.), and avoid sharing any sensitive or private information. Examples of such information include personally identifiable information (PII), protected health information (PHI), financial data, intellectual property (IP), and any other legally protected data. For those seeking a private AI tool with Enterprise Level Data Protection, Microsoft Copilot is available by logging in with their AU email and password. This ensures that chats will not be used to train external AI tools, and data will remain within the Auburn University ecosystem.

A student should include the following statement in assignments to indicate use of a Generative AI Tool: “The author(s) would like to acknowledge the use of [Generative AI Tool Name and version], a language model developed by [Generative AI Tool Provider], in the preparation of this assignment. The [Generative AI Tool Name] was used in the following way(s) in this assignment [e.g., brainstorming, grammatical correction, citation, which portion of the assignment].”

Link to Option 3, Moderate Prohibition
AI Policy: Not Permitted in this Course for Assignments

In this course, it is expected that all submitted work is produced by the students themselves, whether individually or collaboratively. Students must not seek the assistance of Generative AI Tools like ChatGPT or Copilot for graded assignments. Use of a Generative AI Tool to complete an assignment constitutes academic dishonesty. Students may use Generative AI tools as a study tool, but be forewarned that AI tools are not trustworthy.

Link to Option 4, Strict Prohibition Guidelines
AI Policy: Not Permitted in this Course

In this course, it is expected that all submitted work is produced by the students themselves, whether individually or collaboratively. Students must not seek the assistance of Generative AI Tools like ChatGPT or Copilot. Use of a Generative AI Tool to complete an assignment constitutes academic dishonesty.

Options for Allowable AI Use

If faculty elect to allow AI use, especially in limited cases, they should select one or more of the following descriptions of use types, copy the text into the syllabus or assignment, and customize as needed.

Link to AI as a content tutor

Clarify concepts, suggest readings, pose practice questions, help brainstorm, or ask questions for understanding.

✔ Allowed options by assignment type:

  • Short-form & essays: generate questions to plan an outline; clarify terms; simulate an audience.

  • Research & literature reviews: brainstorm search terms; map debates using your provided sources.

  • Lab reports & data analysis: explain methods, units, or statistical ideas (no data generation).

  • Coding/homework: explain error messages; suggest debugging strategies (no final solutions unless allowed).

  • Presentations: practice Q&A; outline talking points.

  • Study aids & tutoring: create practice questions; simulate step-by-step walkthroughs of techniques

✖ Not allowed in this assignment type:

  • Completing graded products for you (e.g., paper, code, slide deck)

  • Generating or altering data

  • Answering graded quiz/test items

Link to AI for writing feedback

Review completed drafts for grammar/clarity/tone after you write your own text. You remain responsible for the content.

✔ Allowed options by assignment type (customize):

  • Short-form & essays: clarity/conciseness edits; style suggestions you review and accept/revise.

  • Research & literature reviews: summarize your drafted paragraphs for coherence checks (verify sources).

  • Presentations: readability checks for slides; speaker-notes clarity.

  • Design/visual media: alt text and caption drafts for your own images; layout suggestions.

✖ Not allowed in this assignment type:

  • Summarizing or paraphrasing others’ work

  • Drafting full papers or sections without your authorship

  • Inventing or citing sources not verified by you

Link to AI for differentiated support

Generate study guides or alternative materials from course docs; language support; accessibility aids (e.g., alt text). Does not replace accommodations.

✔ Allowed options by assignment type:

  • Study aids & tutoring: plain-language summaries of provided readings; flashcards; glossary.

  • Presentations: caption suggestions; outline restructuring for clarity.

  • Research & literature reviews: term definitions; concept maps based on provided sources.

✖ Not allowed in this assignment type:

  • Uploading confidential or copyrighted materials not permitted by course policy

  • Replacing official accommodations

Link to AI as a project assistant

Suggestions during the process of creating an artifact (e.g., brainstorming, outlining, organizing, or wording). Allowed only if the assignment permits; you must revise in your own voice.

✔ Allowed options by assignment type (customize):

  • Short-form & essays: outline; paragraph organization; sentence-level clarity you then revise.

  • Research & literature reviews: synthesize themes from your notes; structure sections (verify citations).

  • Presentations: slide outlines; speaker note drafts that you edit.

  • Brainstorming/peer review: counter arguments; checklist-based feedback to guide revision.

✖ Not allowed in this assignment type:

  • Submitting AI-written sections as your own without permission and revision

  • Bypassing personal reflection or ‘show-your-work’ components

Link to AI as a technical colleague

Technical answers/solutions, debugging hints, unit tests, code style tips. Use only if explicitly allowed and you can explain results line-by-line.

✔ Allowed options by assignment type (customize):

  • Coding/homework: debug suggestions; unit-test scaffolds; refactoring ideas you understand.

  • Lab reports & data analysis: code comments; plotting templates you adapt to your own data.

  • Design/visual media: workflow scripts or prompts you can justify.

✖ Not allowed in this assignment type:

  • Submitting code you can’t explain

  • Using generated code to complete graded tasks when not allowed

  • Generating or altering experimental data

Unacceptable Use

The following types of use are generally considered unacceptable, and should be communicated with students proactively, rather than assumed.

  • Submitting AI-generated work as your own learning/performance when the assignment requires your original analysis, code, design, or voice.

  • Fabrication/falsification: invented sources, data, citations, images, or results.

  • Undisclosed use: using AI even where allowed but not disclosing how.

  • Bypassing learning goals: e.g., using AI to complete “show-your-work,” reflection, or lab notebook steps that assess your own reasoning.

  • Policy & law violations: uploading confidential/regulated data (FERPA/PII/PHI) or proprietary content to consumer tools.

Required Disclosure: AI Contributions (add to end of submissions)

Template for disclosure: The author(s) would like to acknowledge the use of [Generative AI Tool Name], a language model developed by [Generative AI Tool Provider], in the preparation of this assignment. The [Generative AI Tool Name] was used in the following way(s) in this assignment [e.g., brainstorming, grammatical correction, citation, which portion of the assignment].

APA 7 example:

OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (Sept. 29 version) [Large language model].
    https://chat.openai.com

In-text: OpenAI (2025).

MLA 9 example:

“ChatGPT.” OpenAI, 29 Sept. 2025, chat.openai.com. Prompt: “Explain CRISPR base
editing for a lay audience.” Response to [Your Name].

In-text: “ChatGPT”.

Instructor Paste-In (customize & add to your assignment prompt)

“For this assignment, you may use AI as [choose classification(s)] for these tasks only: [list tasks from the menu]. All other uses are prohibited. You must credit your use in an ‘AI Contributions’ note.”

References

Biggio Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). Syllabus for Online Teaching Showcase. Retrieved October 1, 2025, from https://auburn.instructure.com/courses/1303000/assignments/syllabus

Garcia, B., Dibrell, D., & Hebbard, M. (2025, July 18). Navigating interdisciplinary collaborations in the age of AI: A WAC perspective. International Writing Across the Curriculum Conference, Fort Collins, CO.

Developing AI Guidance for Faculty. (n.d.). Generative AI at UNC. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://ai.unc.edu/ai-guidance-for-faculty/

Guidance for Instructors | AI | University of Florida. (n.d.). Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://ai.ufl.edu/teaching-with-ai/expanding-the-ai-curriculum/guidance-for-instructors/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Requirements for Developing Generative AI Tool Policies in WCP Courses – Marion L. Brittain Fellowship Handbook. (n.d.). Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://sites.gatech.edu/bfhandbook/requirements-for-developing-generative-ai-tool-policies-in-wcp-courses/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Note

These guidelines were created by Christopher Basgier in University Writing, with input from student and faculty leaders across campus.